Stablecoins were meant to replace banks, but the companies scaling them are relying on banks more than ever. Here's why.
Stablecoins (digital coins tied 1-to-1 to a real currency like the US dollar) were supposed to let money move around the world without banks. But the opposite is happening — the companies making stablecoins big are building deeper into the banking system than anyone expected.
How a cross-border payment actually works
When a business sends money to another country, the payment has three parts:
The numbers show how small stablecoin payments still are
Small companies can survive with one bank and one stablecoin partner. But at large scale (think $10 billion a year), success depends on how many banking, currency-exchange, and licensing connections a company has built — not on the technology itself.
The hidden danger: relying on one bank
Many stablecoin firms depend on a single banking partner. That's risky because banks can suddenly cut ties. Real examples include the collapses of Silvergate and Signature Bank, and regulators quietly pressuring banks to drop crypto clients ('debanking').
Bottom line: Stablecoins aren't replacing banks — they're teaming up with them. To scale, they need deep banking relationships in every market they touch.
This is an AI-generated summary. Read the original article at: https://decrypt.co/377280/stablecoins-wont-scale-without-banks